Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Tuesday, May 7, 2013
Moral obligations, fantasy surfer, and the Billabong Rio Pro 2013
Alright folks, we're back. It's the Billabong Rio Pro 2013 and everyone is mysteriously getting hurt just to avoid the contest. No defending champ John John. No Owen Wright. No Tiago Pires. Steph Gilmore had Alana Blanchard run over her foot at Bells, managed to finish that contest, AND competed in the following contest in New Zealand just to call in sick for Rio (check out her story here). Am I sensing some not-so-subtle aversion to Rio here?
I won't lie, I haven't been the biggest fan of the Rio Pro in the past. Last year's post is proof of that ("Here we go again"). But the contest last year was surprisingly entertaining, despite my less than tactful comments. So this year I've got a shred of hope and it's because of this I will keep my big mouth shut for a while. Let's see some barrels again this year!
Just one thing: is a contest without John John and Owen nearly as exciting? I'm going with no. I want to see John John defend his title. But mostly I wanted to see an Owen - Adriano rematch. Yes I'm still harboring some bad feelings about his floater shenanigans (check out "Here we go again" if you have no idea what I'm talking about.) Plus Adriano's kind of a dick.
Which leads me to my last qualm: do morals have a place in fantasy surfer picks? I feel like the Brazilians certainly have home field advantage on this one (that's probably putting it lightly) but I am sooooooo incredibly opposed to picking loud, obnoxious, rude, choppy surfers who claim chop-hops. This certainly does not go for all Brazilians, but the stereotype's gotta come from somewhere. Don't get me wrong, I want to win. I hear the prize-packs are legendary. But at what price? It's a tough one guys and I've got less than two hours to choose...
Monday, October 1, 2012
Quiksilver Pro France 2012: Round 1 Upsets, Round 2 Match-ups
Round 1 of the Quik Pro France is over after two days of
questionably contestable conditions. Random shifty peaks, largely closeouts,
led to a kind of free-for-all where just about anyone could win. Heats were
typically low scoring and it was often a battle of the backup scores. With
these trying conditions, I suppose it’s no surprise there were a few upsets.
QUIKSILVER PRO FRANCE ROUND 2 MATCH-UPS:
Jadson Andre barely squeaked by Adriano de Souza and Damien
Hobgood with a mere 9.04 heat total. Patrick Gudauskas (12.70) beat Hawaii favorite
John John Florence (11.67) and Miguel Pupo (6.86). What’s crazy is that a
rookie was odds on favorite in the first place. Tour veteran Kieren Perrow beat
out two of his much younger competitors, Julian Wilson and Adrian Buchan. Perhaps
the wildest upset of Round 1 came in Heat 5, where Dane Reynolds edged out
current world #2 Joel Parkinson. Always the space cadet, Dane floated through
his heat seemingly without realizing he was even in a contest, and gave an
equally spacey post-heat interview.
Of course a great number of the usual suspects won their
Round 1 bouts and get to skip Round 2. Unsurprisingly, Taj Burrow, Kelly
Slater, and Mick Fanning made it through.
With some crazy upsets, Round 2 looks really exciting. Joel
will be up against Trials winner Wiggoly Dantas. Owen Wright vs. Matt Wilkinson
will probably be fun too. But what I’m most excited yet incredibly depressed
about is the all Hawaiian heat of John John and Dusty Payne. Why do they have
to go up against each other?
At least the swell outlook is finally turning up. Let’s hope
the wind doesn’t ruin it!
Check out some highlights:QUIKSILVER PRO FRANCE ROUND 2 MATCH-UPS:
Heat 1: Joel Parkinson (AUS) vs. Wiggolly Dantas (BRA)
Heat 2: John John Florence (HAW) vs. Dusty Payne (HAW)
Heat 3: Adriano de Souza (BRA) vs. Taylor Knox (USA)
Heat 4: Josh Kerr (AUS) vs. Kolohe Andino (USA)
Heat 5: Jeremy Flores (FRA) vs. Yadin Nicol (AUS)
Heat 6: Owen Wright (AUS) vs. Matt Wilkinson (AUS)
Heat 7: Julian Wilson (AUS) vs. Adam Melling (AUS)
Heat 8: C.J. Hobgood (USA) vs. Fredrick Patacchia (HAW)
Heat 9: Adrian Buchan (AUS) vs. Travis Logie (ZAF)
Heat 10: Heitor Alves (BRA) vs. Bede Durbidge (AUS)
Heat 11: Kai Otton (AUS) vs. Tiago Pires (PRT)
Heat 12: Damien Hobgood (USA) vs. Miguel Pupo (BRA)
Saturday, September 29, 2012
Thursday, September 27, 2012
Town (finally) gets some waves
It's been a long, miserable summer for Hawaiian surf. A few small, fickle swells and alot of strong wind led to a less than satisfactory 2012. But in the dying days of summer, the south side is finally lighting up. Here are a few shots of the waves today.
The Quiksilver Pro France 2012 and the World Title Contenders
Likely to start tomorrow, the Quiksilver Pro France is
probably one of the most versatile contests on the ASP schedule. It can be a
fun and playful beach break where high flying aerialists shine or a heaving,
intimidating cave of water demanding power, barrel savvy, and sheer fearlessness.
It was here last year that a teenager from Brazil beat the most decorated
surfer in history. With this year shaping up to be one of the most exciting
title races in recent history, the Quiksilver Pro France may be a make or break
event for a number of title contenders.
Check out the contest here: Quiksilver Pro France 2012
Who could win the title this year? Mick Fanning (41,250
points), Joel Parkinson (39,700), Kelly Slater (35,450), John John Florence (32,650),
Adriano De Souza (30,650), and Taj Burrow (30,150) are all in the running if we
are being really optimistic. In reality, I’d say the race is between Mick and
Joel. Barring a miracle, Taj and Adriano don’t stand a chance. With two 9ths
and a 13th, Taj has already expended his two throw-away scores
and will have to keep a lowly 9th (I’d say anything below a 5th
is a throw-away score for a title contender). Adriano has two throw-aways (9th,
13th) and would likely need straight 3rds or better for
the last four contests this year in addition to the four guys ahead of him
suddenly imploding.
Although John John does have a win this year, he too already
has two throw-aways (9th, 13th) and is unlikely to win
the 2012 title. That being said, I will never give up on John John until the
math makes it impossible for him to win. Yes I’m playing favorites. He’s a
Hawaii native and looks so comfortable in the water it’s almost laughable. So
yes, I’m a John John fan. Emotional leanings aside, the last leg of the
schedule does look to be in John John’s favor. France, if big and barreling, is perfect for
him. Portugal could be a toss- up. Big Santa Cruz is perfect for John John
power hacks. And, well, he practically learned to surf at Pipeline.
Kelly’s in a tough position this year: he’s got two drop scores
as well (INJ, 13). But he’s also already accrued two wins in the last three
contests, including the most recent Hurley Pro at Lowers. I think it’s called
being on a role. And he’s also Kelly Slater. So there’s that. But keep in mind
that two drop scores means he has to perform nearly flawlessly in these last
four contests. Keep in mind that he’s never won the Quiksilver Pro France. This
contest could mean more to him than any other title contender.
With about a 5,000 point difference between them and 3rd
place, it’s starting to feel like Joel and Mick are fighting on their own. Both
only have one throw-away result (Joel: 9th, Mick: 13th).
But the differences lie in their wins. Joel, despite making it to three finals,
has yet to get a win this year. Mick already has two. One of those wins came at
the excruciating expense of Joel at Teahupoo (Joel was winning for about 99% of
the heat, only to be routed by Mick in the dying seconds of the final). Joel
needs a win here at the Quiksilver Pro 2012 to build up some confidence into
this final leg of the year. Right now Mick is certainly the one to beat, as he’s
remained consistently strong, with his only falter in the very beginning of the
year (13th at Snapper).
How do these guys
look going into the Quiksilver Pro France 2012? Only two of our top six
guys got a good result here last year: Kelly (5th) and Taj (5th).
Mick got a 13th, while Joel, John John, and Adriano lost in the
first elimination round, earning a pitiful 25th each. Mick has won
this contest three times (2010, 2009, 2007). Joel has won it once (2006). Kelly,
John John, Adriano, and Taj have never won it.
Final thoughts. Barring
a first place finish at this upcoming contest, I don’t see Taj and Adriano in
title contention. With three low scores already, I don’t see Taj with much of a
chance either way. John John will need to transcend his years and be
ridiculously consistent in these final contests, including the Quiksilver Pro
France. Kelly just needs to be Kelly. Joel needs a win here, has anyone ever
won the title without a single win? Mick is sitting pretty. He needs to be
dominant here, but not as desperately as his fellow title contenders.
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Dorks on a board
This is the best surf clip ever. Brent Dorrington, Ronny Nelson, and Kauai native Sebastian Zietz charge Rockpiles on a stand up. This is what surfing should always be: lighthearted, funny, and just a little bit dangerous. Enjoy!
Thursday, September 20, 2012
Estimating Tsunami Travel Times
Want to know how long you have until a tsunami generated in Chile reaches your doorstep? To figure it out you need two things: the speed of the wave generated and the great circle distance between you and the location of tsunami origin.
Wave speed (c) is related to the depth (H) of the water body the wave is moving through:
c =
√(gH)
where g is acceleration due to gravity = 9.8 m/s2 and H is in meters. The average wave speed in open ocean is approximately 200 m/s. This is fine to use in back of the envelope calculations such as this.
To find the great circle distance between two points you need the radius of the earth (approximately 6370 km) and the spherical angle (ψ) between the points, given by:
ψ = arcos [ sin(φ1)sin(φ2) + cos(φ1)cos(φ2)cos(θ2
– θ1) ]
where φ1 and φ2 are the latitudes of the starting and ending points respectively. θ1 and θ2 are the longitudes of the starting and ending points respectively.
From there, use the spherical angle and radius to find arc length (s): s=rψ. Once you have that, you can find the travel time of the tsunami: t = s/c. Keep in mind that this is very general and rough!
I've generated a Matlab script calculating the travel time for a tsunami generated in Santiago, Chile to reach Honolulu, Hawaii (~11.5 hrs according to my script). If you want to pick different starting or ending points, just mess with the latitudes and longitudes.
Interested in tsunamis? Check out these sites:
Violent Hawaii: Deadly Tsunamis
NOAA Tsunami Website
%Long Gravity Wavesclose allInterested in tsunamis? Check out these sites:
Violent Hawaii: Deadly Tsunamis
NOAA Tsunami Website
clear all
c = 200; % speed of propagation (m/s)
r = 6370; % radius of Earth (km)
r2 = r*1000; % radius of Earth (m)
r = 6370; % radius of Earth (km)
r2 = r*1000; % radius of Earth (m)
lat1 = -35.846; % Latitude of santiago, Chile -33
lat2 = 21.467; % Latitude of Honolulu, Hawaii 22
lon1 = -72.719; % Longitude of Santiago, Chile -71
lon2 = -157.983; %Longitude of Honolulu, Hawaii -158
lat2 = 21.467; % Latitude of Honolulu, Hawaii 22
lon1 = -72.719; % Longitude of Santiago, Chile -71
lon2 = -157.983; %Longitude of Honolulu, Hawaii -158
cosangle = sin(lat1)*sin(lat2) + cos(lat1)*cos(lat2)*cos(lon2 - lon1);
angle = (acos(cosangle))*(180/pi); % angle in degrees
arclength = 2*pi*r2*(angle/360) % arclength between locations (m)time = (arclength/c)*(1/60)*(1/60) % travel time (hr)
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
Mars is cool, stop whining about money and religion
I just watched this clip on NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Mission (MER) and my mind was sufficiently blown. How cool are we, how ingenious, that we can design a series of small robots to not only travel a distance of 55 million kilometers (that's seven long months of loneliness) but to also successfully hit an inconceivably small target and survive?
I guess I must be alone in that though. You know, the doe-eyed wonder at our ability to create? Yea apparently I'm the only one who's not jaded because just about every comment under this clip was either about the 'ridiculous' cost or how this video somehow affronts their religious views (you gotta love people like that, or where would The Daily Show be?).
I don't care how much it costs, this stuff is cool. For all those complaining about how our government is wasting money on something completely useless, stop for two seconds and think about all the useless stuff you bought in the past week. Stuffing your face with Doritos isn't solving world hunger and all that music you purchased on iTunes isn't curbing anthropogenic climate change. Until you start spending money more judiciously I suggest you sit down. So go right ahead, cast the first stone.
We do these things because that's what makes us human. We do it because we can. And you know what, we'll probably come up with a way to turn a profit on space exploration (or exploitation) sometime anyway. Baby steps guys.
And to all those who felt their religious views were somehow threatened by this video, how indescribably sensitive can you be? And how does that thought process work?
space exploration = science = thinking differently = blasphemy ???
We went to Mars. We didn't blow a hole through heaven, I promise. This huge fear of scientific thinking in religious communities is just silly. The two are not mutually exclusive. Just calm down and give everyone a hug or something.
I guess I must be alone in that though. You know, the doe-eyed wonder at our ability to create? Yea apparently I'm the only one who's not jaded because just about every comment under this clip was either about the 'ridiculous' cost or how this video somehow affronts their religious views (you gotta love people like that, or where would The Daily Show be?).
I don't care how much it costs, this stuff is cool. For all those complaining about how our government is wasting money on something completely useless, stop for two seconds and think about all the useless stuff you bought in the past week. Stuffing your face with Doritos isn't solving world hunger and all that music you purchased on iTunes isn't curbing anthropogenic climate change. Until you start spending money more judiciously I suggest you sit down. So go right ahead, cast the first stone.
We do these things because that's what makes us human. We do it because we can. And you know what, we'll probably come up with a way to turn a profit on space exploration (or exploitation) sometime anyway. Baby steps guys.
And to all those who felt their religious views were somehow threatened by this video, how indescribably sensitive can you be? And how does that thought process work?
space exploration = science = thinking differently = blasphemy ???
We went to Mars. We didn't blow a hole through heaven, I promise. This huge fear of scientific thinking in religious communities is just silly. The two are not mutually exclusive. Just calm down and give everyone a hug or something.
Thursday, August 9, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

